Breaking News

Holding against legalising ball-tampering, Waqar says saliva must

NEW DELHI: Michael Holding feels legalising ball tampering in the submit COVID-19 world is a little "self contradictory" whilst Proteas nice Allan Donald is totally on the opposite finish of the spectrum on a subject that has divided evaluations.

The International Cricket Council (ICC), right through its recent CEC assembly, thought to be using artificial substances on the ball as a substitute of saliva.

"I have read that ICC is contemplating preventing people from using saliva on the ball due to COVID-19 and allowing them to use foreign substances on the ball to keep the shine on but in front of the umpire. I don't understand the logic behind that," Holding informed ESPNCricinfo.

No to saliva, yes to polish: Ball-tampering regulations in cricket might change

Cricket might change ball-tampering regulations and approve exterior solution to help polish the crimson cherry in proposed post-corona measures. The topic of saliva being unsafe used to be raised via the ICC's medical committee and it would be addressed prior to cricket resumes. Authorities are taking into account using artificial substances to help polish the crimson ball beneath the supervision of umpires.

News in Brief

Explore Briefs

The West Indies nice additionally puzzled the ICC for moving its stand on the issue via permitting foreign substance as a substitute of saliva or sweat.

"Before they were given to that time they mentioned if they restart cricket it has to be performed in a bio-secure setting.

"They were pronouncing cricketers as an example must isolate themselves for 2 weeks to make certain that the entirety used to be fantastic for after they were given to the venue prior to the fit began. And everybody concerned (with the fit) must do the same factor," he mentioned.

What Holding can't fathom is that if folks quarantine themselves after which get started enjoying, why saliva can't be used then.

"Now, if you're pronouncing everyone is in the bio-secure setting, you might be staying in the same hotel, you don't seem to be shifting for the duration of time you might be enjoying the matches, if that is the case why are you worried about somebody's saliva?

"That person in keeping with what you might be doing must be free of Covid-19. If the ICC thinks that the two-week duration to end up that you are free of Covid-19 isn't foolproof, then that means you might be putting everybody in that setting in jeopardy?

"Why would you want to play cricket beneath those circumstances? It's either safe or it is not. No guessing, please," one of the vital revered voices in world cricket mentioned.

Pakistan legend Waqar Younis made it clear that use of saliva is a must and can't be completed away with when aggressive cricket resumes.

"As a quick bowler, I reject this as a result of this (the use of saliva and sweat) is a herbal process. A ball exchanges fingers all day, you run in, huffing and puffing, you sweat and the use of saliva is herbal slightly than on intent. It's a addiction and also you just can't control this side," Waqar mentioned.

He felt that all some of these concepts show desperation to start out proceedings.

"I don't understand how this dialogue came up however I think individuals who need the game to be performed are annoyed with the lockdown. They are overthinking about it. I doubt this new thought of the use of (artificial) substance as a substitute of saliva is an answer.

"You can make a bowler use a predefined substance on the ball, but at the same time practically it's not possible to prevent a bowler using his sweat or saliva," Pakistan's current bowling coach mentioned.

Donald, on the other hand, is open to the speculation.

"I absolutely agree with legalising ball-tampering. I said so in an article sometime in the 2000s. It happens anyway, we see guys throwing the ball on the ground and umpires say to throw it up and it's pretty obvious what they are doing. It could work if it is well-monitored."

No comments