Breaking News

Make list of defaulters public, SC tells RBI


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court + on Friday held that the Reserve Bank of India + is bound to divulge names of loan defaulters underneath the RTI Act and also requested it to make public inspection reviews containing important evaluate of the functioning of banks and fiscal establishments while warning the banking regulator in opposition to long run violations.

A bench of Justices L Nageswara Rao and M R Shah directed the RBI to withdraw its provide disclosure policy underneath which this information isn't disclosed to the general public underneath the Right to Information Act. The court pulled up RBI for not complying with its 2015 order through which it was once directed to expose the information underneath the transparency legislation.


Though the bench held that RBI committed contempt of court, it, on the other hand, didn't cross any punitive order and let the regulator off with a warning that any further non-compliance of its order would be taken by it “significantly” and RBI would have to face contempt complaints.

The apex court, in its 2015 judgment, had stated, “We have surmised that many monetary establishments have resorted to such acts that are neither blank nor transparent. RBI, in affiliation with them, has been looking to cover up their acts from public scrutiny. It is the accountability of RBI to take inflexible action in opposition to the ones banks which were training disreputable industry practices.”


“From the previous, now we have additionally come across monetary establishments which attempted to defraud the general public. These acts are neither in the most productive pursuits of the country nor within the pursuits of electorate. To our wonder, RBI as a watchdog should had been extra devoted against disclosing knowledge to most of the people underneath the Right to Information Act,” it had stated.


Despite the SC direction to divulge knowledge on shady industry practices of monetary establishments underneath RTI, the banking regulator has persistently refused to expose knowledge and framed a disclosure policy not in line with the SC order.


Taking exception to RBI’s resistance to bring transparency to its functioning, the court stated, “Though we can have taken a major view of the respondents (RBI and others) continuing to violate the directions issued by this court, we give them a last alternative to withdraw the disclosure policy insofar as it contains exemptions that are opposite to the directions issued by this court. They are duty-bound to furnish all knowledge in terms of inspection reviews and different subject material aside from the material that was once exempted within the judgment.”


The court rejected RBI’s rivalry that the reviews comprise confidential knowledge on banking operations and it's not possible to make public all the record. It additionally grew to become down the plea of RBI that the 2015 verdict should be re-examined.


No comments