Breaking News

Farmer tiff worries PepsiCo headquarters


(This article was initially printed by the Economic Times on 29/04/2019)
NEW DELHI: Executives at Pepsi-Co’s headquarters and its Asia-Pacific place of job are said to have conveyed their concern over the Indian unit’s determination to take felony action towards Gujarat farmers for growing a lot of potato following social media hostility and requires a boycott of the company’s merchandise.


“Headquarters has asked PepsiCo India to resolve the issue at the earliest and work as a team,” said one in every of two senior executives acutely aware of tendencies. “They are concerned in regards to the felony issue and the backlash.” The Apac place of job is in Dubai.

PepsiCo has sued 9 farmers in Gujarat for alleged “rights infringement” at the grounds that they “illegally” grew its registered FC5 potato selection used to make Lays chips.

Free to make choices: Pepsico India

A PepsiCo India spokesperson said the native unit is unfastened to make its own choices.

“The native team at PepsiCo India is absolutely empowered to ‘act as owners’ and supplied to take choices in keeping with native marketplace conditions,” the spokesperson said. “Beyond this, there's nothing extra to add.”



He didn’t reply to queries about any worries that may were expressed by executives at the Dubai place of job and head place of job in New York.

"Unfortunate to have been dragged in the court by PepsiCo": Gujarat potato farmers

Appearing sooner than the Commercial Court by which four from Sabarkantha district were accused by PepsiCo of the usage of its registered number of potato seed, the farmers sought time till June 12 to respond.

Activists seek Centre's intervention in PepsiCo's case towards potato farmers

Nine farmers from Sabarkantha and Aravalli districts were dragged to courtroom by PepsiCo for allegedly growing a lot of potatoes for which it has claimed Plant Variety Protection (PVP) rights.

PepsiCo has a potato issue with farmers

The US multinational had sued 9 farmers for alleged "rights infringement" by illegally dealing with its registered potato selection used in its Lays chips.


Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Congress leaders tweeted towards the company’s determination to sue farmers in Gujarat over the weekend. On Friday, PepsiCo had introduced to withdraw the fits towards the farmers if they prevent growing the FC5 selection. The farmers have sought time till June 12 to respond.

“I'm giving an ultimatum to Pepsi India to withdraw cases towards Indian farmers within the next 72 hours, in a different way we will start a campaign to boycott all PepsiCo merchandise in India,” tweeted Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga, a spokesperson of the BJP’s Delhi unit.

The farmers have maintained that PepsiCo acted in violation of the Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act (PPVFR Act), which seeks to give protection to specified plant types, rights of farmers and plant breeders, and encourages building and cultivation of new kinds of vegetation.

Congress leader Ahmed Patel condemned PepsiCo’s move.

“PepsiCo’s determination to take Gujarat’s potato grower farmers to courtroom is ill-advised and brazenly wrong. It is in violation of the farmer’s rights below the PPVFR Act.” He added that the state govt “shouldn’t stay its eyes shut… Corporate hobby can't dictate what our farmers must or mustn’t cultivate.”

For the maker of Pepsi cola, Lays chips and Quaker oats, India is a vital marketplace at a time when mature markets corresponding to the US have slowed. Being perceived as antifarmer may just ship the wrong message, mavens said.

“A big global corporate suing farmers is bad optics below any circumstance,” said Lloyd Mathias, previously with PepsiCo’s management team and now an unbiased trade consultant. “PepsiCo can have discovered a better means to give protection to its interests. This can have a adverse fallout for PepsiCo in India.”

PepsiCo informed the Ahmedabad courtroom on Friday that it has proposed to “amicably settle with people who were unlawfully the usage of seeds of its registered selection”.

The corporate said on Friday that “PepsiCo has additionally proposed that they (the farmers) would possibly transform part of its collaborative potato farming program. In case they don't want to join this program, they are able to merely signal an settlement and develop other to be had kinds of potatoes”.


The corporate said in its statement that it was “pressured to take the judicial recourse as a final lodge to safeguard the larger hobby of hundreds of farmers which are engaged with its collaborative potato farming program”.


Advocate Anand Yagnik, who had appeared on behalf of the farmers, accused PepsiCo of “corporate vanity”, adding, “An MNC enters into our farmlands, procures crops without our wisdom and frames us. It is infringing upon the precise to privacy and dictating terms about what we will have to eat. This is unacceptable.”


Yagnik said PepsiCo officials entered farms with advocates and picked up crop samples without the knowledge of farmers. “The entire means of evidence collection was fallacious,” he said.


PepsiCo has registered separate cases towards 9 farmers of the state up to now for allegedly the usage of the potato selection, for which it has exclusive rights in India. The corporate additionally sought damages of Rs 1.five crore every from four farmers of the Sabarkantha district. Five other farmers were sued by Pepsi-Co in north Gujarat below equivalent fees in 2017-18.


No comments