Breaking News

UN court has jurisdiction to hear part of Iran-US dispute


THE HAGUE (NETHERLANDS): The International Court of Justice ruled Wednesday that it has jurisdiction to listen to part of a case introduced by way of Iran towards the United States that seeks to claw back round $2 billion price of frozen Iranian belongings.

The US Supreme Court awarded the cash to victims of a 1983 bombing in Lebanon and different attacks linked to Iran.

At hearings remaining year, the United States raised five objections to the court's jurisdiction and the admissibility of the case, which Iran filed in 2016.

The ruling got here amid high tensions between Washington and Tehran after President Donald Trump pulled America out of the nuclear deal remaining year.

The United Nations' highest court upheld one US objection to its jurisdiction, however it rejected any other and stated the 3rd objection should be discussed at a later level within the case. The judges also rejected two US objections to the admissibility of the case.

The case will now proceed to the deserves section and is predicted to take months or years to complete.

Tehran filed the case in 2016 in keeping with the 1955 Treaty of Amity between Iran and the US, a bilateral agreement that Washington withdrew from remaining year.

The little-known treaty regulating commerce between the two nations used to be amongst a lot of ones signed within the wake of World War II because the Truman and Eisenhower administrations tried to collect a coalition of countries to counter the Soviet Union. It features a clause that sends unresolved disputes about interpretation of the treaty to the arena court.


The attack at the center of the case used to be a suicide truck bombing of a US marine barracks in Beirut in October 1983 that killed 241 army staff and wounded many more. A US court ruled that the attack used to be carried out by way of an Iranian agent supported by way of the Hezbollah militant team.


The court, in an 11-4 majority ruling, upheld a US objection to its jurisdiction in keeping with state immunity claimed by way of Iran, however they unanimously rejected Washington's assertion that measures freezing Iranian belongings fell outdoor the scope of the treaty.


The judges unanimously rejected US claims that the case used to be an abuse of process and that it should be thrown out as a result of Tehran's alleged sponsorship of terrorism and involvement in nuclear proliferation.


Iranian representative Mohsen Mohebi known as the verdict a success, but added he had expected the court to reject the entire American objections. American attorneys left the court with out commenting.


No comments