Breaking News

UIDAI now says arrested man only attempted to misuse biometrics

JIND: After a person was arrested — primarily based of a grievance filed by means of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) — for misusing the biometrics (fingerprints) of a former Aadhaar operator to withdraw cash from his account, its officers appear to have changed their stand now.

On Saturday, the grievance (a duplicate of which is with TOI) given to police by means of UIDAI deputy director Ashutosh had mentioned that “in keeping with inputs supplied by means of banks, NPCI and different dependable sources”, they discovered that the transaction on November 14, 2018, was accomplished the use of devices operated by means of banking correspondent Shamsher Singh.

However, when Shamsher was offered in local Jind court docket on Tuesday after a two-day police remand, detective staff in-charge and investigation officer (IO) of the case Samarjeet Singh said that UIDAI officers had told them that Shamsher had simplest attempted to make a transaction from his device on January 24, 2018, nevertheless it was no longer a hit.

Shamsher has now been sent to judicial custody. Talking to TOI, IO Samarjeet said, “Fresh inquiry by means of UIDAI crew, which had come to Jind to analyze the topic, found that no transaction was accomplished from Shamsher’s device on January 14, 2018. They, alternatively, told us that an strive was made for a similar on January 24, 2018.”

Neither the former Aadhaar operator Vikram’s grievance nor UIDAI’s grievance or the FIRs filed on their basis had any point out of such an strive. Both the lawsuits mentioned misuse of Vikram’s fingerprints to withdraw Rs 1,000 from a micro ATM on November 14, 2018 and again to withdraw Rs 7,500 from his some other HDFC account on November 23, 2018. On Vikram’s requests, banks had revealed that money was withdrawn in Delhi and Madhubani, Bihar.

On the basis of recent data supplied by means of UIDAI, police have added two extra sections in the case towards Shamsher — Sections 511 (punishment for attempting to devote offences punishable with imprisonment for existence) and 84 C (whoever makes an attempt to devote an offence punishable by means of this Act or causes such an offence to be dedicated) of the IT Act.

The case was in the beginning filed below the Aadhaar Act and identity robbery and cheating by means of personation by means of the use of pc resource (Sections 66C and 66D of the IT Act, 2000) and cheating (Section 420 of IPC). It isn't recognized if the identity robbery charges were dropped.

The IO said that now the police crew would go to banks from the place transactions have been accomplished to know the place the money had gone and the way.

No comments