Breaking News

Rania SHO booked for criminal breach of trust

FATEHABAD: Police registered a case in opposition to station home officer (SHO) of Rania police station of Sirsa for alleged prison breach of accept as true with on the subject of robbery of gold jewellery that belonged to a lady protection officer (WPO) from Fatehabad. While cracking the case, he allegedly didn't record all of the recoveries made and let off two goldsmiths who have been concerned. The woman protection officer and her suggest husband Manohar Lal Agarwal ended their hunger strike on January 26.

City Fatehabad police registered a case in opposition to sub-inspector Om Prakesh (former investigation officer of Fatehabad CIA) for prison breach of accept as true with through public servant and prison conspiracy on the grievance of suggest Manohar Lal Agarwal, Fatehabad Police Lines resident.

In his police grievance, he stated he's a working towards suggest and his spouse Rekha is a girl protection officer. According to him, unidentified miscreants stole Rs27,000, 35 tola gold and 50 tola silver jewellery from his place of abode on December 24, 2017. Police registered a case in opposition to unidentified persons on December 25, 2017 beneath Section 457 (lurking, house-trespass) and 380 (robbery in residing home) of the IPC, he stated.

He stated then Fatehabad CIA sub-inspector Om Prakash arrested Vikram alias Bittu within the case and indexed recoveries as 11.6 tola gold and 200 grams of silver jewellery within the recovery commentary of the accused. Apart from those ornaments, sub-inspector Om Prakash is alleged to have illegally taken possession of two earrings and a sequence of nose ring.

Apart from this, he alleged, two unidentified goldsmiths redesigned the stolen jewellery, which was now not shown within the recovery commentary either. He accused the sub-inspector of colluding with the goldsmiths and allowing them to off.

In a grievance lodged with the SP, he demanded registration of a case beneath Section 166 (public servant disobeying law with intent to reason injury to any individual), 201 (causing disappearance of proof of offence), 215 (taking present to assist get better stolen property), 409 (prison breach of accept as true with through public servant), 420 (dishonest and dishonestly inducing supply of property), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for goal of dishonest), 413 (habitually dealing in stolen property), 120-B (prison conspiracy) and 34 (commonplace purpose) of the Indian Penal Code in opposition to sub-inspector Om Prakash and the 2 unidentified goldsmiths. However, police registered the case handiest beneath two sections.

No comments